Legal Opinion

United States v. Hargrove

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 28, 1991No. ACM 28778PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RIVES, Judge:

Many things can go wrong with the collection and testing of drug urinalysis samples. This appellant seeks reversal of his conviction because the government did not provide a witness to discuss something that could have gone wrong in his case. We disagree that the test for witness production includes a purely speculative scenario, and we affirm.

The facts here are similar to those in many other cases that involve a prosecution for the use of drugs: Technical Sergeant Fred Hargrove was randomly selected to provide a urine specimen for drug testing, the chain of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. ShoverUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  2. United States v. ShoverCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API