Legal Opinion

Cormier v. Carty

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 4, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodman, J.

The plaintiff (Pulcherie) appeals from a judgment of a Probate Court which determined that three bonds of the Seattle National Bank in the joint names of the plaintiff and the defendant (Leona) were held subject to an oral trust "for the benefit of the plaintiff during the plaintiffs life... with the remainder payable to the defendant upon the death of the plaintiff.” The judgment declares that these bonds represent "the monies originally in the Charlestown Savings Bank, Merchants Cooperative Bank, and Suffolk Franklin Savings Bank ... subject to [that] oral trust ....” We affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blanchette v. BlanchetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Malone v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. MacLennan v. MacLennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Drain v. Brookline Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Bradford v. EastmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Markell v. Sidney B. Pfeifer Foundation, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Cormier v. CartyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Desrosiers v. GermainMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  4. Gershaw v. GershfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Sico v. SicoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API