Minch v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellant A.R. Minch appeals from summary judgment dismissing his claims for injunctive relief and affirming respondent Buffalo-Red River Watershed District’s order requiring Minch to clean and maintain a public right-of-way ditch on his property, arguing that (1) the watershed district lacked statutory authority to order him to clean a public right-of-way ditch; (2) its order violated his right to procedural due process of law; (3) its order was an unconstitutional taking of his property; (4) its order was unconstitutionally void for vagueness; and (5) he was denied…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Watab Township Citizen Alliance v. Benton County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007