Legal Opinion

Minch v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 7, 2006No. A05-2339PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant A.R. Minch appeals from summary judgment dismissing his claims for injunctive relief and affirming respondent Buffalo-Red River Watershed District’s order requiring Minch to clean and maintain a public right-of-way ditch on his property, arguing that (1) the watershed district lacked statutory authority to order him to clean a public right-of-way ditch; (2) its order violated his right to procedural due process of law; (3) its order was an unconstitutional taking of his property; (4) its order was unconstitutionally void for vagueness; and (5) he was denied…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jarecki v. G. D. Searle & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. SuessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Watab Township Citizen Alliance v. Benton County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API