Legal Opinion

Scott v. Riley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the New Madrid Circuit Court. — Hon. H. O. O’Bryan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

The questions of law arising in this case cannot be well stated without an introductory recital of the following uncontroverted facts appearing from the record, and bearing upon the present controversy.

One, Belle Allen, a single woman, was the owner of a watch and chain. She died, and, after her death, this property was found in the possession of the plaintiff, and he was arrested on the. charge of having acquired it feloniously, but, upon the trial, was acquitted of any felonious intent. In the meantime the plaintiff had placed the property as security with one Drulinger, and the defendant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meier v. ThiemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  2. Chapman v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Gray v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  4. Gartside v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  5. Bayless v. LefaivreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Manley, Admx. v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Campbell v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Bagnell v. Chemical BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Jones v. BurdenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API