Rousseau v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MALONEY, Judge.
Appeal is taken from a conviction for capital murder. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 19.03(a)(2). After finding Appellant guilty, the jury answered the special issues in the affirmative and punishment was assessed at death. Article 37.071, V.A.C.C.P. Direct review by this Court was then automatic. Article 37.071, § 2(h), V.A.C.C.P. Appellant raises thirty-one points of error, but does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence.
In points of error fifteen through seventeen, appellant alleges that the trial court erred in permitting the State, over defense counsel’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Tompkins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Lester v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center v. Apodaca, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Yarborough v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.