Yarborough v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
WOMACK, Judge.
The question in this case is whether a prosecutor’s unchallenged statement about a venire member’s'demeanor can constitute adequate support for a trial court’s finding in a Batson hearing.
The venire panel in this case comprised 42 persons. Because one person was excused for cause, the last person reached for jury service was Number 33. The parties agreed that the State peremptorily challenged 7 black venire members and 2 Hispanic venire members. The parties also agreed that 10 of the 33 people were black, 3 of whom served on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Nieto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- Blackman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- State v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Thieleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.