Disciplinary Counsel v. Donnell
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 79 Ohio St.3d 496.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. CLIFTON. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Clifton,
1997-Ohio-159.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Permanent disbarment—While filling dual role of guardian and attorney to the guardian, allowing ward’s assets to dissipate and appropriating funds of the estate for business and personal use. (No. 96-2805—Submitted May 7, 1997—Decided October 1, 1997.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 94-58. ___________________ {¶ 1}…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miami County Bar Ass'n v. HallowsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ArmonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LuceyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Tonge v. SalisburySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
- Cleveland Bar Assn. v. ArmonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.