Legal Opinion

Kevin M. Millette v. State of Rhode Island

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 17, 2018No. 15-330PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Suttell, for the Court.

Claiming that his defense counsel, who was not licensed to practice law in Rhode Island, was engaging in unlawful conduct, Kevin Millette (Millette or applicant) argues that he was denied his constitutional right to counsel when he pled nolo contendere to two criminal offenses and admitted to violating his probationary sentence. Millette further maintains that his defense counsel's associate, who was licensed in Rhode Island and who appeared in court with Millette, was merely a "straw man" and thus complicit in the scheme to practice law without a license.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Mitchell, Dennis L.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. v. Watson, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API