Legal Opinion
Boyden v. Troken
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 8, 1973No. 72 C 1837PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BAUER, District Judge.
This cause comes on the motion of defendants, James B. Conlisk, Jr. and Paul McLaughlin for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This is a civil rights action instituted pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981,1983,1985, and 1986. Jurisdiction of this Court is based on 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. The amount in controversy is alleged to exceed the sum of $10,000 exclusive of interest and costs.
The plaintiff, Norman Boyden, is a citizen of the United States who resides in Chicago, Illinois. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sanberg v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Jordan v. KellyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1963
- Barrows v. FaulknerDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1971
- Patrum v. MartinDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1968
- MacK v. LewisDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Steven C. Draeger, by and Through Norman A. Draeger, Guardian Ad Litem v. Grand Central, Inc., and David ParkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Sammy L. LEONARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF FRANKFORT ELECTRIC AND WATER PLANT BOARD, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Malone v. SchenkDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
- Ford v. BreierDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
- Jackson v. WiseDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1974