Legal Opinion

Guyton Et Vir v. Pgh., McCurdy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1944No. Appeal, 100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This is an action in trespass brought by Katie Guy-ton and Pringle Guyton, her husband, to recover damages sustained by them respectively by reason of injuries received by the wife plaintiff, from a fall due to a defective sidewalk abutting premises 1712 Webster Avenue, Pittsburgh. The city brought in as additional defendants Fidelity Trust Company (hereafter referred to as Fidelity) and Mary Turfley, individually and as Trustees of the Estate of George G. Turfley, deceased, alleged to be the owners, and Florence R. McCurdy, alleged to be the mortgagee in possession…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zisman Exr. v. Duquesne CitySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Smith v. Penn Township Mutual Fire Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Foell Packing Co. v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Minner v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Ignatowicz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Pintek v. ALLEGHENY COUNTYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Ignatowicz v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Ruhe v. Kroger Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API