Legal Opinion

Minner v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1949No. Appeals, 200, 201 and 204PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Deew,

This action in trespass was brought by Francis R. Minner, plaintiff, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him when on December 29, 1945, he stepped into a hole in a sidewalk in front of the property known as No. 812 Allegheny Avenue, on the North Side of the City of Pittsburgh.

The suit was instituted against the City, which in turn joined as additional defendants, John, George and Carl Henkel, alleged owners of the property, but only George and Carl Henkel were able to be served. George and Carl in turn brought in Commonwealth Trust Company and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruder v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Roop v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Guyton Et Vir v. Pgh., McCurdySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Beal v. Atlantic States Motor LinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moorehead v. LopatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Enright v. KirkendallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Edwards v. DonleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Simone, N. v. Zakiul Alam, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Beck v. Kilroy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Westmoreland County1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API