In the Interest of C.A.T.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*204OPINION
Opinion By
Justice MURPHY.
The Office of the Attorney General appeals the trial court’s order dissolving a writ of garnishment levied against the bank account of appellee Father. In dissolving the writ, the trial court concluded Father, as a self-employed carpenter, was his own employer and attachment of disposable earnings in his personal bank account violated section 157.312(g) of the Texas Family Code. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.312(g) (Vernon 2008). The trial court also concluded the seizure of Father’s account violated the judgment on child-support arrears because Father was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David L. Smith & Associates, L.L.P. v. Stealth Detection, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Bank of America, N.A. v. EstradaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- In Re Cat, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- in Re Schlumberger Technology Corporation and the Dow Chemical Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019