Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.A.T.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 22, 2010No. 05-08-01293-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*204OPINION

Opinion By

Justice MURPHY.

The Office of the Attorney General appeals the trial court’s order dissolving a writ of garnishment levied against the bank account of appellee Father. In dissolving the writ, the trial court concluded Father, as a self-employed carpenter, was his own employer and attachment of disposable earnings in his personal bank account violated section 157.312(g) of the Texas Family Code. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 157.312(g) (Vernon 2008). The trial court also concluded the seizure of Father’s account violated the judgment on child-support arrears because Father was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Catalina v. BlasdelTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David L. Smith & Associates, L.L.P. v. Stealth Detection, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. EstradaDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
  3. In Re Cat, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  4. in Re Schlumberger Technology Corporation and the Dow Chemical Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API