Legal Opinion

Steele v. Hanna

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1889No. 13,524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Hancock Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J. —

It appears from the petition upon which the present proceeding is based, that a certain drain or ditch had been duly located and established under the drainage act of 1881, as amended by the acts of 1883 and 1885, by the order. and judgment of the Hancock Circuit Court, and that in the *334course of the proceeding, viz., in the report of the commissioners of drainage, a mistake in the description of a certain quarter section corner had occurred by inadvertently writing the word “south” where the word “north” should have been, and was intended to be, written. This mistake was carried…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cambridge Valley National Bank v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Dawson v. ShirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ryon v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Runnels v. KaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Rogers v. VenisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Rogers v. VoorheesIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Osborn v. Maxinkuckee Lake Ice Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Kent v. CowdinIndiana Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API