Legal Opinion

City of Jamestown v. Miemietz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1959No. 7818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEIGEN, Judge.

The plaintiff, the City of Jamestown, seeks by civil action to abate a public nuisance and to compel the defendants to remove an obstruction from a public street in the city. It is alleged that the defendants had constructed a dwelling house that extends into 14th. Avenue S. E., a distance of approximately 34½ feet. That the plaintiff had made numerous demands upon the defendants to remove the obstruction and that the location of the defendants’ dwelling or building upon the said street is in violation of the ordinances of the city and the law of North Dakota.

The amended answer…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ramstad v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Grandin v. GardinerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Rovenko v. BokovoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Oliver v. SynhorstOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Williams v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rye Beach Village District v. BeaudoinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Larson v. TonnesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Dacotah Hotel Company v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Smith v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Gruebele v. Mott Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API