Legal Opinion
Bears v. Wallace
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 22, 1971PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The Appellate Division upheld the trial court’s determination that neither Gugliotta nor Bears was entitled to recovery from the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board. Bears v. Wallace, 112 N. J. Super. 210 (App. Div. 1970). We denied certification to Gugliotta but granted certification to Bears (and to his guardian ad litem Ruff individually). Gugliotta v. Wallace, 58 N. J. 19 (1971).
On February 25, 1964 Bears was a passenger in a car owned by Paul Wallace. He was seated on the rear seat whereas Yincent Gugliotta and Frances Wallace (the wife of Paul) were seated on the front…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Feuchtbaum v. ConstantiniSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Minter v. Bendix Aviation Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Minter v. Bendix Aviation Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Williams v. WittNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Jones v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barsotti v. MercedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010