Legal Opinion

Saults v. First Tennessee Bank (In re Saults)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 11, 2002No. Bankruptcy No. 01-23019; Adversary No. 02-2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*742 MEMORANDUM

MARCIA PHILLIPS PARSONS, Bankruptcy Judge.

In this adversary proceeding, the debtor seeks to avoid a prepetition garnishment of her bank account under 11 U.S.C. § 522(h) and a determination that the defendant has violated the automatic stay by its actions in refusing to turnover the garnished funds. Presently before the court is the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on judicial estoppel, the debtor’s alleged bad faith, the alleged untimeliness of the debtor’s exemption claim, the absence of trustee approval to the avoidance action, and the lack of a willful stay…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re KuzniewskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Joshua Aaron NewberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
  3. Joshua Aaron NewberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API