Marcus v. McKesson Drug Co. (In Re Mistura, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge:
This appeal questions the trial court’s construction of Arizona’s Commercial Code, its evidentiary rulings and, ultimately, its order holding that appellants’ security interest in personal property is subordinate to appellee’s.
I
Mr. and Mrs. Marcus, the appellants, sold a drug store to Mistura, Inc., taking back a security interest in the personal property for the unpaid balance of the purchase price. They also leased the business premises to Mistura. Subsequently, Mistura sought financing from a number of sources and eventually obtained a loan from McKesson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lewis v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Goldberg Co. v. County Green Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1977
- In Re DavidoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pieri v. Lysenko (In Re Pieri)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- McKesson Drug Co. v. MarcusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Le Sueur's Fiesta Store, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984
- Smith v. Lachter (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Bank of Holmen v. Ruf (In Re Ruf)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.