Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1994No. 60482-7PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

This case concerns the admissibility of contraband evidence discovered during a weapons frisk and seized without a warrant from Defendant David Hudson’s coat pockets. Before trial Hudson moved to suppress the evidence, asserting a violation of his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. At the suppression hearing, the arresting officer testified that he immediately recognized the contraband as cocaine through his sense of touch. The State argued that the evidence should be admitted under a "plain feel” exception to the warrant requirement. Video Tape Recorded…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. GarvinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. GarvinWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API