Legal Opinion

Estate of Layne v. Ezersky

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1966No. 32302PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOERNER, Commissioner.

This is a statutory proceeding to discover assets. Section 475.160, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S. The court found that the defendant was unlawfully withholding sums totaling $6,426.44 belonging to the ward and ordered him to pay and deliver the same to Archie T. Douglas, the ward’s guardian. Defendant’s appeal followed in due course.

The guardian initiated the proceedings in the Probate Court of St. Francois County, Missouri, on October 2, 1964, by the filing of an affidavit consistent with the foregoing statute. A citation was issued, and on defendant’s application and affidavit…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Petersen's EstateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Lolordo v. LacySupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Baker v. AtkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Charles v. PatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Godsy v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kopp v. C. C. Caldwell Optical Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1986
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API