Legal Opinion
Stanton Miller v. United States of America, Dept. Of the Army, Portland District Corps of Engineers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1994No. 93-35477Published
1Opinion of the Court
37 F.3d 1505
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Stanton MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, DEPT. OF the ARMY, PORTLAND
DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-35477.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994.
Decided Sept. 28, 1994.
Before: ALDISERT,* THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM*…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Carolyn L. Ducey v. United States of America, Lois M. Olson v. United States of America, Helen Grugel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Van Dinter v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Gaeta v. Seattle City LightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.