Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hawaiian Trust Co. v. Wilder

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1963No. 4177Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OE

LEWIS, J., IN WHICH WIBTZ, J., JOINS.

The first point for consideration is the direction in Article First of the will that testatrix’ executor pay her debts and funeral and administration expenses, and also “pay out of my residuary estate” all the estate and inheritance taxes. The court below held, and correctly so, that by “residuary estate” in this article the testatrix meant Article Sixth, appearing on pages 12-15 of her will, which provided:

“Sixth: I give, devise and bequeath the rest, residue and remainder of my property, wherever situated and of whatever nature,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Reid v. CorriganIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kam Chin Chun Ming v. Kam Hee HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Grise, Admr. v. Weiss, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Weed v. HogeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  5. In re the Estate of LalakeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1922

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API