Legal Opinion

Security National Bank v. Lish

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1973No. 7024PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRIS, Associate Judge;

Security National Bank (Security) sued appellee Lish, an attorney, for losses sustained on a loan which had been made by the bank to a third party. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, based upon the fact that no attorney-client relationship existed between Security and Lish. 1 We reverse.

In the fall of 1969, Lish represented A. Bolling Newsome, as well as Newsome’s then-employer which did business with Security. Lish is an attorney of considerable experience, and he was well known to officials of the bank through prior transactions. Newsome…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Spargnapani v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Malcolm Price, Inc. v. SloaneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Hornbeck Offshore Transportation, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Remeikis v. Boss & Phelps, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Needham v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API