Legal Opinion

Daley v. Judge of Probate

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1939No. 3128PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.

The case is wrongly entitled. The Judge of Probate is not a party to proceedings of this sort. This appeal should be in the name of the executrix against the decedent’s heirs. Judge of Probate v. Daly, 88 N. H. 477.

The executrix, upon whom rested the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the instrument which she offered for probate was a valid will (Albee v. Osgood, 79 N. H. 89; Bartlett v. McKay, 80 N. H. 574; Gaffney v. Coffey, 81 N. H. 300), opened the trial by calling to the stand or accounting for the absence of the three persons whose names appeared as witnesses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitman v. MoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  2. Albee v. OsgoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  3. Edgerly v. EdgerlySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
  4. Patten v. CilleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
  5. Bartlett v. McKaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ross v. CarlinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API