Legal Opinion

Ross v. Carlino

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1979No. 78-192PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

This is an appeal from certain rulings of the probate court made during and after a hearing on a petition to reexamine the will of Jean C. Warden in solemn form. RSA 552:7 (Supp. 1977). The issues presented are first, whether the probate court erred in ruling on a subscribing witness’ availability, RSA 552:12, on the basis of hearsay evidence alone, and second, whether the court erred in refusing the contestant’s request for a transfer of issues to the superior court for a jury trial pursuant to RSA 567-A:10 (Supp. 1977). We hold that the court correctly denied the request to transfer issues,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hardy v. MerrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1875
  2. Knight v. HollingsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1906
  3. Albee v. OsgoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Hodgman v. KittredgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
  5. Lord v. LordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Speers v. SpeersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. In re Estate of WashburnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. In re Estate of FullerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. In re Estate of ColantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2024
  5. Ross v. CarlinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API