Legal Opinion
Manpower v. Lewis
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided October 20, 1992No. 79113PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BAILEY, Presiding Judge:
Petitioners Manpower and CNA Insurance (Manpower) seek review of the Trial Court’s order awarding compensation benefits to Respondent Tamma R. Lewis (Claimant). Manpower asserts the Trial Court erred in finding that Claimant’s injury arose out of and in the course of her employment, and holding Manpower and its insurer, CNA, responsible therefor.
Manpower is in the business of providing temporary employees to employers in need of extra help. Manpower pays the employees’ wages, and maintains Workers’ Compensation insurance covering its employees.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Ishmael v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Pepco, Inc. v. in Re FergusonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Temporary Staffing, Inc. v. J.J. Haines & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Ragsdale v. Wheelabrator Clean Water Systems, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
- Van Zant v. Peoples Electric CooperativeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Morrow v. Baby DollsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Opinion No. (2006), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2006