Legal Opinion

Leaututufu v. Superior Court

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 8, 2011No. 2453306PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*Supp. 4Opinion

KARNOW, P. J.

Introduction

Petitioner Abraham Leaututufu (Petitioner) seeks a writ of mandate in aid of his federal right to a speedy trial. A petition for writ of mandate is appropriate where a defendant claims a violation of this right. (E.g., Ogle v. Superior Court (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1007, 1013-1014 [6 Cal.Rptr.2d 205].) We defer to the court’s factual findings. (E.g., Joseph v. San Francisco Housing Authority (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 78, 81 [25 Cal.Rptr.3d 179].)

We are called on to review the application of the now classic test to determine if postarrest delay violates a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. People v. BookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dews v. Appellate Division of the Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Bartholomaus CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API