Leaututufu v. Superior Court
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 4Opinion
KARNOW, P. J.
Introduction
Petitioner Abraham Leaututufu (Petitioner) seeks a writ of mandate in aid of his federal right to a speedy trial. A petition for writ of mandate is appropriate where a defendant claims a violation of this right. (E.g., Ogle v. Superior Court (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1007, 1013-1014 [6 Cal.Rptr.2d 205].) We defer to the court’s factual findings. (E.g., Joseph v. San Francisco Housing Authority (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 78, 81 [25 Cal.Rptr.3d 179].)
We are called on to review the application of the now classic test to determine if postarrest delay violates a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- People v. BookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dews v. Appellate Division of the Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Bartholomaus CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014