Dews v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Petitioner Keith Laroy Dews seeks a writ of mandate to compel the dismissal of misdemeanor charges against him, arguing the 19-month delay between the issuance of an arrest warrant on the criminal complaint and the date of his arraignment violated his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The People agree the 19-month delay was presumptively prejudicial, and urge us to return the case to the trial court for a balancing of the factors articulated in Barker v. Wingo (1972) 407 U.S. 514, 530 [33 L.Ed.2d 101, 92 S.Ct. 2182]…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- David Allen Benson v. Todd SpitzerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Dickerson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026