Legal Opinion

Dews v. Appellate Division of the Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 2014No. A139102PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEEDHAM, J.

Petitioner Keith Laroy Dews seeks a writ of mandate to compel the dismissal of misdemeanor charges against him, arguing the 19-month delay between the issuance of an arrest warrant on the criminal complaint and the date of his arraignment violated his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The People agree the 19-month delay was presumptively prejudicial, and urge us to return the case to the trial court for a balancing of the factors articulated in Barker v. Wingo (1972) 407 U.S. 514, 530 [33 L.Ed.2d 101, 92 S.Ct. 2182]…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Serna v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Harris v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Allen Benson v. Todd SpitzerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025
  2. Dickerson v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. People v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API