Legal Opinion

Washington & Old Dominion Railway v. Jackson's Administrator

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1915PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax county in an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

Upon a demurrer to the evidence judgment was rendered for the defendant in error, plaintiff below, in an action to recover damages for the death of his intestate, Frank Jackson, which was attributed to the wrongful act of the defendant, the Washington and Old Dominion Railway.

The controlling question submitted for our determination is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

The testimony shows that plaintiff’s intestate was a colored boy sixteen years old, who at the time he was killed was lying, presumably asleep, on the right-hand rail of the defendant’s track going west, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad v. Joyner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Ferguson & Co. v. DaughtreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  4. Gordon v. FunkhouserSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Norfolk & Western R. v. Dunnaway's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Butler v. ParrochaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Wolonter v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Goshen Furnace Corp. v. Tolley's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  5. Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Winstead's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API