Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Martin v. Connor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1984No. 82-1817Published

1DissentHolmes, J.

The majority opinion here represents yet another unfortunate and unwarranted onslaught upon the State Insurance Fund of Ohio. There is no dispute that the relator, Donald Martin, has in fact been paid $8,907.75 more than allowed under Ohio law. The only issue is whether the Administrator of the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation may recoup this amount on behalf of the state of Ohio.

This court has affirmatively answered a similar issue in the case of State, ex rel. Weimer, v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 159 [16 O.O.3d 174], wherein the claimant was erroneously over-compensated due to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Tarpy v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Long v. BettmanOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State ex rel. Board of Education v. State Department of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API