Legal Opinion

Parker Ex Rel. Parker v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Shaw, J., at November Term, 1914, of MeckleNbueg. Civil action. At tbe conclusion of tbe plaintiff’s evidence tbe court sustained tbe motion to nonsuit. Tbe plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeowN, J.

Tbis action is brought by tbe plaintiff, a boy 13 years of age, to recover damages for an injury sustained on account of bis touching an electric feed wire of tbe defendant. Tbe evidence proves that tbis feed wire ran under a bridge maintained by tbe defendant over a cut between tbe city of Charlotte and tbe village of Hoskins.

Tbe ears of tbe defendant ran underneath tbis bridge, and under it are its trolley wires and feed wires. Tbe feed wire is about 12 inches below and underneath tbe bridge. Several boys were playing on tbis bridge, tbe plaintiff being among them. One of tbe boys reached…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trout v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elks v. . Insurance CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Small v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Love v. Virginian Power Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Adams v. . BullockNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Croxton v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API