Legal Opinion

Vastar Resources, Inc. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1996No. 84759PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Presiding Judge:

Appellant Vastar Resources, Inc. [Vastar] appeals from an order of the Corporation Commission which determined that the Zed-lav No. 1-9 well was producing from the Osborn formation, the common source of supply to which the Commission had authorized the well to be completed. Vastar’s predecessor in interest (Arco Oil & Gas Company) filed an application with the Commission alleging that, from examination of records of a nearby well and information from the Zedlav No. 1-9 well, there was some confusion about the formation in which the well had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
  4. Kingwood Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. United Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Premier Resources, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harding & Shelton, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API