Vastar Resources, Inc. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellant Vastar Resources, Inc. [Vastar] appeals from an order of the Corporation Commission which determined that the Zed-lav No. 1-9 well was producing from the Osborn formation, the common source of supply to which the Commission had authorized the well to be completed. Vastar’s predecessor in interest (Arco Oil & Gas Company) filed an application with the Commission alleging that, from examination of records of a nearby well and information from the Zedlav No. 1-9 well, there was some confusion about the formation in which the well had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Nilsen v. Ports of Call Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Kingwood Oil Company v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- United Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Premier Resources, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harding & Shelton, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005