Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Keystone Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 26, 1923No. 11320PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C!

The Keystone Supply Company, as plaintiff, sued C. F. Anderson, Wilson Dillen, Jeanette Helms, James Harney, and Blaak, Sivalls & Bryson, a corporation, as defendants, in the district court on account of labor performed and supplier furnished for drilling an oil and gas well. Defendants Harney and Black, Sivalls & Bryson answered and filed cross-petition against Anderson and Dillen to foreclose their liens on leasehold interests of Anderson and Dillen in certain lands in Nowata county, and the American Glycerine Company intervened and filed cross/petition against same…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Randall, Sawyer & Dyer v. Merideth & AilmanTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Dunham v. LoverockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Barrett v. BuchananSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Butler Savings Bank v. OsborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. White v. A. C. Houston Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Edwards v. HardwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. McAnally v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co. v. McDowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Jones v. Sinclair Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API