Legal Opinion

State v. O'HARA

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. 81062-1PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

217 P.3d 756 (2009)

STATE of Washington, Petitioner,

v.

Ryan J. O'HARA, Respondent.

No. 81062-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 15, 2009.

Decided October 1, 2009.

Andrew J. Metts, III, Spokane County Prosecutor's Office, Spokane, WA, for Petitioner.

Jordan Broome McCabe, Attorney at Law, Bellevue, WA, for Respondent.

FAIRHURST, J.

¶ 1 Under RAP 2.5(a), appellate courts may refuse to hear any claim of error not raised at trial. Even if not raised at the trial court, a party on appeal may raise claims of "manifest error affecting a constitutional right." RAP 2.5(a). Ryan J. O'Hara…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. SchalerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. City of Seattle v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State Of Washington, Respondent/cr-appellant v. Jesse Randall Ackerman, Appellant/cr-respondentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State Of Washington, V. Jesse GouleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. State v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 2022

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API