Legal Opinion

Waldrip v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1925No. 16884PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyi.es, C. J.

1. “Motions for continuance, made at the term at which the indictment is found, while addressed to the discretion of the court, stand upon a different footing from such motions made at a subsequent term. In such cases the discretion of the court should be liberally exercised in favor of a fair trial, no less than that the trial should be speedy; and every facility should be afforded a defendant for presenting his defense as fully as he might be able to do were the case tried at a subsequent term. Reasonable opportunity for the defendant to prepare his defense should not be sacrificed in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McArver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Blackman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Cartee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Cassidy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  4. Crowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API