Legal Opinion
United States v. Schwimmer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 13, 1992No. Nos. 972, 1317, Dockets 91-1629, 91-1738PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIMBA M. WOOD, District Judge:
This case concerns the payment of attorneys fees to Dershowitz & Eiger, P.C. (“D & E”), counsel for Defendant Martin Schwimmer in appellate criminal proceedings. The appeal results from the Hon. Arthur D. Spatt’s September 30, 1991 refusal to approve a stipulation between Martin Schwimmer and the Government permitting Martin Schwimmer to withdraw $55,000 from a court-controlled bank account in order to pay D & E attorneys fees. The District Court denied a motion to reconsider that decision on December 10, 1991. D & E now appeals the September 30 and December 10…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Robert E. Douglas, Jr., Noel Lussier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Richard Coluccio, Theresa Coluccio, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dsi Associates LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.