Legal Opinion

Whitsett v. Hester-Bowman Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 1, 1956No. 36083Published

1Opinion of the Court

94 Ga. App. 78 (1956)

93 S.E.2d 788

WHITSETT

v.

HESTER-BOWMAN ENTERPRISES INC., et al.

36083.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided May 1, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1956.

Davis & Friedin, for plaintiff in error.

Lokey & Bowden, Hamilton Lokey, Scott S. Edwards, Jr., contra.

NICHOLS, J.

1. The plaintiff in error strongly contends that she was entitled to judgment by default against both defendants because the trial court erred in refusing to strike the defensive pleadings filed after the case became in default.

Under the Act of 1946 (Code, Ann. Supp., §§ 110-401 and 110-404) a case to which no…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Pilgreen v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Mattox v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  4. Whitsett v. Hester-Bowman Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. Buttersworth v. SwintCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API