Legal Opinion

Cobine v. City of Eureka

District Court, N.D. California

Decided April 25, 2017No. C 16-02239 JSWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court is the motion filed by the City of Eureka, the Eureka Police Department and Andrew Mills, Chief of Police (“collectively “Eureka”) to dismiss the first amended complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers, considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blain v. California Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  2. Dragasits v. RuckerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  3. Gregory L. Young v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. Kramer v. AvisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
  5. Prado v. City of BerkeleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API