Legal Opinion

State v. Dawn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1994No. S-93-396PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Further review of Schuyler Dawn’s appeal of his conviction for distribution of a controlled substance has been granted to remedy the failure of the lower courts to appoint counsel for Dawn’s direct appeal and to address his claims that in the trial court (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the prosecutor failed to disclose information material to his defense, and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in setting his appeal bond.

The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed Dawn’s conviction on direct appeal even though Dawn had not been afforded his constitutional right to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CodyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. BecerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ChairezNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. GriffinNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API