Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 28, 2019No. 17-0367Published

1Dissent

APPEL, Justice (dissenting).

Under article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution, can a police officer use a common minor traffic violation as an after-the-fact pretext to seize a vehicle and its passengers when the actual reason for the stop was constitutionally inadequate? Today's majority says yes. I say NO!

I. Summary.

History demonstrates that one of the fundamental purposes of search and seizure law is to cabin the discretion of police officers in choosing whom to subject to search and seizure. Generalized discretion in the hands of a law enforcement official has been anathema to the…

2Cases cited226 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API