Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 27, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00047Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 In late August 2020, Defendants Jay Noland, Lina Noland, Thomas Sacca, and Scott 16 Harris (together, the “Individual Defendants”) filed a motion for leave to amend. (Doc. 17 183.) Specifically, the Individual Defendants sought leave (1) to “amend their answer to 18 correct inadvertent admissions” and (2) to assert “counterclaims” against three government 19 attorneys employed by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Sensient Colors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.