Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Steele

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 2012No. 080868370; A143696PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORTEGA, R J.

Husband appeals a general judgment of dissolution, challenging an award of indefinite spousal support to wife and three supplemental judgments awarding wife attorney fees. We conclude that the trial court’s award of indefinite unallocated compensatory and maintenance spousal support of $4,200 per month is within the range of legally correct outcomes and reject husband’s attorney fee challenge without further discussion.

Husband seeks de novo review, requesting that we make one or more factual findings anew on the record and identifying those facts that he contends “do not comport…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In Re the Marriage of BaileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. In Re the Marriage of AbramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. In re the Marriage of GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LoganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of DowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API