Legal Opinion

Susan Spell v. Natalie Stone

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 8, 2019No. 2:19-cv-05886Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSAN SPELL, ) Case No. CV 19-5886 JGB(JC) ) 12 Petitioner, ) ) ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING 13 v. ) PETITION AND ACTION, ) DENYING REQUESTS FOR 14 NATALIE STONE, et al., ) JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DENYING ) A CERTIFICATE OF 15 Respondents. ) APPEALABILITY ) 16 17 I. SUMMARY 18 On July 9, 2019, petitioner Susan Spell, who is proceeding pro se, filed a 19 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2243, 2254 20 and

18 U.S.C. § 22651

(“Petition”), and a supporting declaration. On July 16, 21…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vernon C. Weygandt v. Donald Look, Superintendent, and the Attorney General for the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. BormesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Herbert M. Crawford v. Griffin Bell, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API