Legal Opinion

Miles v. Centennial National Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 21, 1926No. Appeal 229PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from judgment on a case stated (which will appear in the reporter’s statement). It was brought to ascertain whether defendant bank can retain the proceeds realized on the sale of collateral belonging to plaintiff but wrongfully pledged by a borrower. The court below held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover part of the proceeds. Defendant appealed.

Kendrick & Company, brokers, borrowed $25,000 from defendant on February 28, 1922, on their collateral note. Among the collateral were three $1,000 Liberty bonds which belonged to plaintiff but had been in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oleon v. Rosenbloom & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Cochran v. Fox Chase BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. King v. Mellon National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Mason v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Ryman v. GerlachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heffner v. First Nat. Bk. of Hunt'donSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. National Bank of Germantown & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Land Title Bank and Tr. Co. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API