Walter & Shuffain, P.C. v. CPA Mutual Insurance Co. of America Risk Retention Group
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
NANCY GERTNER, Judge.
The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that the facts as alleged in Fourth-Party Plaintiff Rudolph Friedmann LLP’s complaint do not support any contractual or tort-based theory of indemnification, there being no objection. “Accordingly, the Fourth-Party Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Count II is allowed, and Rudolph Friedmann’s claim for indemnification is dismissed.”
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON FOURTH-PARTY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
DEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Axis Insurance Company v. Barracuda Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Bader v. WatsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024