Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Wood

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1941PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, P. J.

This is an action for. damages' for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. Tried before a jury the verdict was for the defendant. A motion by plaintiff for a new trial was sustained' because of an alleged error in one of defendant’s instructions, and defendant has appealed from the order granting plaintiff a new trial.

In her petition plaintiff alleged primary negligence of defendant’s failure to have his automobile under control, failure to swerve, slow down, check the speed or stop, failure to keep a lookout and failure to warn, and also alleged negligence under the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGowan v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Hardin v. Ill. Central Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Elder, Dempster & Co. v. Weld-Neville Cotton Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Mann v. PulliamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Swain v. Anders and Newingham.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vaeth Ex Rel. Vaeth v. GeggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. East v. McMenamySupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Graham Ex Rel. Bodine v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Wood v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Burris v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API