Legal Opinion
Colonial Sugar Co. v. Waldrep
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 26, 1926No. 15928PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below, and the defendant in error was defendant below, and for convenience they will be referred to herein as they there appeared.
August A. Fite & Company, a brokerage company of Tulsa, was representative ' of Jjamborn & Company, • brokers of New Orleans. Mr. Davis, a representative of Fite & Company, procured an order for 360 sacks of sugar from -the defendant and sent it to Lamborn & Company, who presented it to the plaintiff herein, and on August 6, 1920, the plaintiff and defendant, by direct communication, entered into a written contract which is the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Cowan v. CurranIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Corporation v. Ruth K. BohlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Witt v. GarrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Roye Realty & Developing, Inc. v. Arkla, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Mid-Continent Life Ins. Co. v. IvenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Drummond v. CorbinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938