Napora v. Napora
Michigan Court of Appeals
1DissentJ. T. Kallman, J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that the trial court erred in concluding that it was required to uphold the stipulation of the parties. I believe that both the letter and the spirit of the Child Custody Act, MCL 722.21 et seq.; MSA 25.312(1) et seq., support the opposite conclusion.
Section 7 of the act, MCL 722.27; MSA 25.312(7), provides in part:(1) If a child custody dispute has been submitted to the circuit court as an original action under this act or has arisen incidentally from another action in the circuit court or an order or judgment of the *248circuit court, for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zawisa v. ZawisaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RobinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Meyer v. RosenbaumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Christopher v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Currey v. CurreyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.