Legal Opinion

Husa v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1944No. 29088PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

This appeal was taken by the department of labor and industries from a judgment rendered upon a. jury verdict, accompanied and supported by the following answers to special interrogatories propounded by the trial court:

“We the jury in the above entitled cause do find as follows:
“Interrogatory No. 1. Has the disability of the plaintiff, if any' been aggravated after January 12, 1938, and before June 10, 1940, as a proximate result of the injury of July, 1937? Answer: Yes.
“Interrogatory No. 2. Has additional disability, if any, resulting from plaintiff’s injury been discovered…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holler v. W. S. Dickey Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Miller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Alfredson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Sumerlin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Morris v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ehman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Berndt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Hastings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Spalding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API