Legal Opinion

Rich v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 10, 1894No. 99PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appraisement for duty of certain artists’ colors, imported by one Rich.

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge.

By paragraphs 50 to 60, inclusive, of the paint and color schedule of the tariff act of October 1, 1890, duties are respectively imposed upon various colors, such as “blues,” “chrome green,” “ochre,” “umber,” “sienna,” etc.; some colors being subjected to a specific, and others to an ad valorem, duty. By paragraph 61 of the same schedule, duty is imposed upon artists’ colors of all kinds, in tubes or otherwise. Artists’ colors are the colors named in the paragraphs preceding 61, when of a fine grade, specially prepared and put up for the use of artists in tubes,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. United States v. La MannaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. Reiss & BradyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  4. Davis v. Trade Dollar Consol. Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  5. Orman v. SalvoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API