Legal Opinion

Prolerized New England Company v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 28, 2014No. 2013-0357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBassett, J.

The respondent, the City of Manchester (City), appeals an order of the Superior Court (Brown, J.) denying the City’s motion to dismiss and granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the petitioner, Prolerized New England Company (Prolerized). The City argues that the trial court erroneously ruled that RSA chapter 322 preempts the City’s ordinances regulating junk and scrap metal dealers. RSA ch. 322 (2011 & Supp. 2013). We reverse and remand.

The trial court found the following facts to be undisputed. Prolerized is engaged in the business of scrap metal recycling, and operates two scrap…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. North Country Environmental Services, Inc. v. Town of BethlehemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Tirrell v. JohnstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. BowersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. In Re Guardianship of WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Clare v. Town of HudsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert Jesurum v. WBTSCC Limited Partnership & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  2. Stephen E. Forster d/b/a Forster's Christmas Tree Farm & Gift Shoppe v. Town of HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
  3. State v. Heidi C. Lilley The State of New Hampshire Kia Sinclair The State of New Hampshire v. Ginger M. PierroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. Stephen E. Forster d/b/a Forster's Christmas Tree Farm & Gift Shoppe v. Town of HennikerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API